http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-11-26 14:00:37 UTC --- Patchlet in Comment #6 passes testing for me. As I tried clumsily to explain, I don't think it's consistent to avoid the warning for Comment #1 if we warn for Comment #13 scoped, but it's also annoying that the "too small to hold all values" warning it's enable by default, thus can't be suppresed: maybe we could give it a name (if we don't want to re-open the discussion about -Wnarrowing and the range of the underlying type when the type is fixed ;)
