http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54471
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-21 02:26:56 UTC --- On 20-Nov-12, at 7:06 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Can't reproduce that with a cross. The tree optimizers definitely > don't > optimize it into abort, and neither the assembly looks like what you > are > mentioning above. I'll recheck. I definitely remember looking at the RTL from the expand pass. That's why I marked it as a tree optimizer bug. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
