http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55159
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com>
2012-11-02 11:39:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Thus, Daniel, is this invalid?
I think this part of the problem is indeed valid:
template <class T0, class T1>
struct min_t
{
static bool less(T0 x, T1 y) { return x < y ? x : y; }
constexpr static auto* f = &less; // #5
};
min_t<int, int> mi; // #8
"8| required from here|
5|error: declaration of 'constexpr auto* const min_t<int, int>::f' has no
initializer"
(With or without & in front of less)
According to my understanding this should be accepted.
