http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839
--- Comment #37 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-02 02:16:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > The change I mention in #c22 > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=184110 > tests for atomic ops on all of bool, short, int and long long, where the > previous test was for *either* atomic bool or atomic short. My fix for > powerpc > removed the long long test. Does mips lack atomic on bool or short? No it does not lack atomic for either book or short. I am getting exactly the same failure as mentioned in #c3 and not the double free though.
