http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52718



--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-11-01 
19:07:10 UTC ---

Ok, I can reproduce this. Note, I don't think it's the same issue reported here

earlier. Apparently something is going wrong with the pragma. A WA is writing:



  Bar(Foo = Foo(0));



in this case the warning is correctly suppressed. The 0 in the Foo constructor

doesn't matter, the warning is correctly suppressed and you can as well remove

it from the testcase. I'm looking into this, hopefully can be fixed without

reworking too many diagnostic things outside this specific warning proper.

Reply via email to