http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54769

--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 
2012-10-02 06:04:56 UTC ---
In C++03 this was supposed to be ill-formed, but - as Mike Miller explained to
me - with the acceptance of CWG 1111 (no kidding ;-))

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1111

this code should now become accepted.

Reply via email to