http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54343
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-22 09:32:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > HJ's fix for PR 54332 will probably fix this one, too. Could you re-test? > > Thanks. Doesn't fix it. ==18936== 3,984 bytes in 249 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 28,126 of 29,883 ==18936== at 0x4C29ADD: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==18936== by 0xCE2D27: xmalloc (xmalloc.c:147) ==18936== by 0x6B05FD: df_refs_add_to_chains(df_collection_rec*, basic_block_def*, rtx_def*) (df-scan.c:2669) ==18936== by 0x6B50B4: df_bb_refs_record(int, bool) (df-scan.c:3644) ==18936== by 0x6B51BC: df_scan_blocks() (df-scan.c:678) ==18936== by 0x7B6C1D: rest_of_handle_reload() (ira.c:4390) ==18936== by 0x818CEA: execute_one_pass(opt_pass*) (passes.c:2157) ==18936== by 0x819034: execute_pass_list(opt_pass*) (passes.c:2212) ==18936== by 0x819046: execute_pass_list(opt_pass*) (passes.c:2213) ==18936== by 0x68F533: expand_function(cgraph_node*) (cgraphunit.c:1609) ==18936== by 0x690998: compile() (cgraphunit.c:1714) ==18936== by 0x690F14: finalize_compilation_unit() (cgraphunit.c:2089)
