http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54248
Bug #: 54248
Summary: Comment in standard library header talks about boost
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: zeratul...@hotmail.com
This is rather trivial thing, but bits/concept_check.h contains the following
comment near the bottom:
// Note that the obvious and elegant approach of
//
//#define glibcxx_function_requires(C) boost::function_requires< boost::C >()
//
// won't work due to concept templates with more than one parameter, e.g.,
// BinaryPredicateConcept. The preprocessor tries to split things up on
// the commas in the template argument list. We can't use an inner pair of
// parenthesis to hide the commas, because "boost::(Temp<Foo,Bar>)" isn't
// a valid instantiation pattern. Thus, we steal a feature from C99.
Should this comment really be talking about boost?
