http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54025
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-07-19 15:18:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Ah! Let's add in CC both Benjamin and Daniel then. I more and more tend to change my mind: I recommend to ignore the recommendation of N3303 and to make duration conforming with the current library spec. The described use-case here makes very much sense to me and demonstrates to me that N3303 did overreact here. But I would be happy to hear Benjamin's position as well.
