http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53946
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-12 23:48:57 UTC --- >this is how musl libc defines it. Then there is a mismatch between musl libc and GCC. GCC and glibc define it to be long on x86_64. Also musl libc is not currently supported as a target for GCC, there are some changes needed to be made to GCC to support it fully.