http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35040
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-27 16:17:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Answer (see link): All these are wrong per answer to an interpretation > request For completeness, that is Fortran 95's "000090" at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1451-N1500/N1473.txt, which got incorporated in Fortran 95, Corrigendum 2 (and in Fortran 2003).