http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706

--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-18 
09:50:01 UTC ---
It's a bit surprising, but I guess it makes sense.  I'd reorder the
initializers too, so that we release stuff in the reverse order of allocation.

Reply via email to