http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-12
10:27:15 UTC ---
Small testcase:
int a[256];
int b[256];
void foo (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i)
{
b[i] = a[i] * 23;
}
}
you can see that we shuffle even the vector with constants around! Not taking
into account the REG_EQUAL note which is gone at split1 time, removed by
either loop2_invariant or loop2_unswitch.
(insn 26 24 27 3 (set (reg:V4SI 82 [ vect_var_.10 ])
(mult:V4SI (reg:V4SI 83 [ MEM[symbol: a, index: ivtmp.20_9, offset: 0B]
])
(reg:V4SI 85))) t.c:9 1496 {*sse2_mulv4si3}
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (mult:V4SI (reg:V4SI 83 [ MEM[symbol: a, index:
ivtmp.20_9, offset: 0B] ])
(const_vector:V4SI [
(const_int 23 [0x17])
(const_int 23 [0x17])
(const_int 23 [0x17])
(const_int 23 [0x17])
]))
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:V4SI 84)
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:V4SI 83 [ MEM[symbol: a, index:
ivtmp.20_9, offset: 0B] ])
(nil)))))