http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53310
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-10 21:27:52 UTC --- Draft patch. I think it makes sense to move the allocation out of the loop: --- a/libgfortran/intrinsics/eoshift2.c +++ b/libgfortran/intrinsics/eoshift2.c @@ -79,2 +79,6 @@ eoshift2 (gfc_array_char *ret, const gfc_array_char *array, ret->dtype = array->dtype; + + /* xmalloc allocates a single byte for zero size. */ + ret->base_addr = xmalloc (size * arraysize); + for (i = 0; i < GFC_DESCRIPTOR_RANK (array); i++) @@ -92,6 +96,2 @@ eoshift2 (gfc_array_char *ret, const gfc_array_char *array, GFC_DIMENSION_SET(ret->dim[i], 0, ub, str); - - /* xmalloc allocates a single byte for zero size. */ - ret->base_addr = xmalloc (size * arraysize); - }