http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #42 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-07 14:34:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > I lost a bit the overview, but I think the following still needs to be done: > > - 4.4/4.5/4.6: Backporting the fix for nonpresent actuals to elemental procs, > cf. commit in comment 5 / comment 6. That is a true [4.4-4.6] regression > - 4.6: Backporting for the fix for unallocated/unassociated variables to > elemental procedures. That's not a true regression. Not yet backported. The first issue (cf. comment 0) occurred with user code. It is probably sufficient to only backport that one to only 4.6. > - The test case of comment 13 / attachment 26291 [details] Now fixed (4.7/4.8). > - The test case of comment 23 / attachment 26392 [details] > "sub_ctae" is invalid in needs to be removed. The test case compiles without > any problems, but the program segfaults at run time for: > call sub_ct(var1) > call sub_ct(var2) > if the variables aren't allocated. That seems to be the same issue as > comment 31. Namely: The present() check does not work for CLASS. Seems still to be the case. "print *, present(y)" should print false for comment 31 as "y" is an unallocated actual to an nonalloctable dummy. It shows "T". > - For the following, a test case should be written, tested, and included > in the test suite (partially covered by the tests above): Still valid, cf. comment 36
