http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
--- Comment #10 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2012-04-06 04:52:13 UTC --- I made the warnings on by default. Any opinion on whether I should have made them depend on OPT_Woverflow instead? I guess I thought the warning is slightly different in this case than the case of just a regular numeric literal because the warning might cause the programmer to examine a different type of operator as a solution - say template or raw. Still regtesting.
