http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52842
Bug #: 52842
Summary: [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] LDBL_MIN_*
wrong for IBM long double
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc-*-*
$ gcc -dM -xc /dev/null -E | grep DBL_MIN
#define __DBL_MIN_EXP__ (-1021)
#define __DBL_MIN_10_EXP__ (-307)
#define __LDBL_MIN__ 2.00416836000897277799610805135016e-292L
#define __DBL_MIN__ ((double)2.22507385850720138309023271733240e-308L)
#define __LDBL_MIN_EXP__ (-968)
#define __LDBL_MIN_10_EXP__ (-291)
The LDBL_MIN_* values should be identical to the DBL_MIN_* values.
