http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-15
09:48:31 UTC ---
Bootstrapped/regtested now on x86_64-linux and i686-linux (trunk) and
{x86_64,i686,powerpc,powerpc64}-linux (4.7 branch, with the rs6000.c change
backed out). No regressions. So this looks ok for 4.8/4.7.1 to me, for 4.7.0
I think we should just keep the rs6000 hack. Thanks.
