http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52546
--- Comment #2 from Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail dot com> 2012-03-09 22:53:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Is there any way to tell the compiler how much stack does a naked function > > consume (or that it consumes zero stack)? Is this a GCC bug? > > It's a limitation. We could indeed do better, but if you know how much stack > space the function uses, what's the point in asking the compiler? :-) Ok, that's understandable and it's a really good function. It'd be certainly favorable to avoid using such feature (specify how much the function uses), but exactly for cases like this, it'd be very helpful to have. I'm no GC hacker myself so I have no idea how much work it'd be to write such a thing and if it'd be acceptable at all. Thanks for your quick reply!
