http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
| |atches/2012-02/msg01080.htm
| |l
--- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-21
13:12:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> > Unfortunately, with the patch I got following new LTO link failures on
> > x86_64-linux:
> >
> > gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link,
> > -flto
> > -fgnu-tm
> > gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-2 c_lto_trans-mem-2_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-2_1.o link,
> > -flto
> > -fgnu-tm
> > gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-4 c_lto_trans-mem-4_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-4_1.o link,
> > -flto
> > -fgnu-tm
> >
> > I'll have a look a that, even though they look rather scary.
>
> Don't you see the failures without the patch (see pr52297)?
No, I don't, for some reason. Nevertheless, it indeed seems to be an
unrelated problem and so I have posted the patch to the mailing list
and now only wait for test results on a platform with address spaces:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg01080.html
