http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |missed-optimization Last reconfirmed| |2012-02-16 Component|regression |tree-optimization AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-16 10:39:34 UTC --- I didn't see the regression on a SandyBridge machine with -Ofast -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -march=native [-flto]. But I can see the regression on an AMD Bulldozer machine. I will have a look. Note that the patch was to fix a wrong-code issue, so we may have to live with the performance regression.