http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52116
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-04 11:09:44 UTC --- Created attachment 26572 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26572 patch to fix (2) I am not surprised. Location information in GCC is not very precise. Have you tested with GCC 4.7? For 1), someone would need to look more closely at the locations recorded by each pragma, and compare them with the locations of the diagnostic. Fixing 2) is easier. Just check the output of the first diagnostic and only emit the second if the output was true. Also, change the second warning() to inform(). An untested patch attached. Feel free to take it, test it and submit it. http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
