http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51522
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-02-04 00:19:16 UTC --- > Yes, I saw the same thing. But, as I didn't see any relation between > resolve.c:10559 and the r183681 patch, I assumed this was something which was > present before and didn't investigate further. Note that I did not say that the segmentation fault was caused by r183681. I only said that it reappeared at this revision, in the same way I do not think the problem has been fixed by r183010, but only hidden. I have tried some versions I have and found that with r183001 there is no segmentation fault for the reduced test in comment #4, only the original test gives it, while for r179630 both give the segmentation fault. Note that I do not get any segmentation fault for both tests on powerpc-apple-darwin9.