http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-01-26 16:12:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) > Created attachment 26468 [details] > better patch > > This one should work. It does;-) I have applied the patch on revision 183541 on top of the Paul's patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00214.html (pr51870) and Tobias' ones for pr51970 and pr51434 comment #12. It regtested without regression and all the failures reported in comments #25 and #26 are gone. It passes the full comment #13 test fixed as in comment #22 (I blindly trust that it is the "right thing to do") and it fixes pr51514 and the test in pr41587 comment #1 (at least part of it: it now prints " 0 0 42" while I'ld expect " 42 42 42"(?); without the patch I get an ICE pr41587_db.f90:10:0: internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get, at fortran/trans-array.c:147). The test in comment #23 gives an ICE with/without the patch: pr50981_4.f90: In function 'MAIN__': pr50981_4.f90:16:0: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2016 i.e., the same ICE as for pr51977 (I did not tested the patchlet in comment #27). Thanks for the work!
