http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-26
15:50:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 26472
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26472
gcc47-pr52001.patch
Untested fix. It doesn't make any sense to insert any reverse ops when V is
already known to have a location which is certainly simpler than that and
permanently available through the entire function.
