http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-21 10:34:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > ... so this is a build/config issue - or, alternatively, the segment name can > be specified as above since it is ignored for non-mach-o platforms. note: gcc/lto/lto-object.c hardwires this without any ill effect on other platforms. So, since the test and the section are lto-specific, I'd suspect that this is the right solution rather than some tricky config machinery.
