http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51840

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 
00:53:17 UTC ---
I think the problem here is the label references are being moved which is
correct as GCC thinks the labels where the address was taken is not going to
happen.  I don't think you can use asm goto like this.  If you want a smaller
indirect goto, then file a bug against GCC instead of working around it.

Reply via email to