http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105

--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-10 
08:45:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Did any interpretation requests go in on this and did we get an answer back?

No, but I just wrote one:
  http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2012-January/004976.html

The next J3 meeting will be #197, February 13-17, 2012, Las Vegas NV USA

The IR should pop up soon at:
  http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/197/


> I am leaning toward current 4.7 is OK and 4.6 has the regression.

Sorry, that twists my mind. 4.6.0 *and* 4.7 produce "******". (While g77 and
GCC 4.1 to 4.5 produce "**    ".)

Any reason - in terms of the standard - why you "am leaning toward current
4.7"?

I believe that Bob Corbett and Malcolm Cohen are right and "**    " is the
correct output - even if more compilers have six asterisks:

"**    ": g77, gfortran < 4.6, g95, NAG f95, PGI
"******": gfortran >= 4.6.0, ifort, crayftn, open64, pathf95, Sun/Oracle f95,
IBM xlf

Reply via email to