http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51781
Bug #: 51781 Summary: Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: kti...@gcc.gnu.org Target: *-*-* The following code shows an issue about missed optimization for ==/!= comparisons. extern unsigned char ar[256]; int foo (int x, int y) { int i = (int) ar[x]; return (i == (y & 0xff)); } Compiled with 4.7 using -O2 we get the following optimized tree: ;; Function foo (foo, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1600, cgraph_uid=0) foo (int x, int y) { int i; _Bool D.2716; int D.2715; int D.2714; unsigned char D.2713; <bb 2>: D.2713_2 = ar[x_1(D)]; i_3 = (int) D.2713_2; D.2715_5 = y_4(D) & 255; D.2716_6 = D.2715_5 == i_3; D.2714_7 = (int) D.2716_6; return D.2714_7; } But to be expected would be: ;; Function foo (foo, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1709, cgraph_uid=0) foo (int x, int y) { unsigned char D.1719; _Bool D.1716; int D.1714; unsigned char D.1713; <bb 2>: D.1713_2 = ar[x_1(D)]; D.1719_9 = (unsigned char) y_4(D); D.1716_6 = D.1713_2 == D.1719_9; D.1714_7 = (int) D.1716_6; return D.1714_7; }