http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-28 22:25:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I haven't ran all tests on it yet, but CSiBE shows average code size reduction > of approx. -0.1% for -m4* with some code size increases in some files. > Would something like that be OK for stage 3? Looks good, though not appropriate for stage 3, I think.
