http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51268
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-29
14:44:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I would say that although I partially disagree the choices made in the Fortran
> Standards in this context, gfortran is not to blame here. So I think this
> "bug"
> can be closed.
Well, it (and the other compilers) could still be blamed for not implementing
submodules earlier. (For instance, the authors of "Fortran 95/2003 explained"
assumed that it would get implemented before most of the Fortran 2003 features.
As it turned out, it gets implemented as one of the later Fortran 2008 (!)
features.)
CLOSED bug.
