http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-11-22 16:34:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Created attachment 25882 [details] > Patch for new memset/memcpy implementation > > (In reply to comment #9) > > Regressions caused by the new memset/memcpy expansion are > > > > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/wchar_t/1.cc execution test > > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/wchar_t/9874.cc execution test > > FAIL: 27_io/manipulators/basefield/char/1.cc execution test > > FAIL: 27_io/manipulators/basefield/wchar_t/1.cc execution test > > FAIL: 27_io/objects/wchar_t/12.cc execution test > > FAIL: 27_io/objects/wchar_t/13.cc execution test > > FAIL: events run > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c execution test > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c execution test > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (internal compiler error) > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (internal compiler error) > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (test for excess errors) > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34077.c (test for excess errors) > > FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90 execution, -O2 > > -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops > > With the attached patch fails on PR34077 and arrayarg.f90 are fixed, fails on > cleanup-tests are probably caused by incorrect testcase (see > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49503). Do you have a patch for those C++ and Java regressions?
