http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-06 18:16:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > > Wouldn't standard procedure be to revert the offending patch? > > Well, first, I am not sure that the "offending patch" is identified yet According to comment 0 and comment 8, it should be between 179600 and 179611. I have to admit that I don't see any obvious candidate at first sight, but maybe someone else does? (Half of the commits in this range is not even on the trunk.)
