http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50922
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-31
10:18:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Am 30.10.11 20:14, schrieb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org:
> > --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski<pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-30
> > 19:14:49 UTC ---
> > Signed integer overflow is undefined so this is invalid.
> >
> If this is true, shouldnt the compiler give an error message or at least
> a warning?
> But I think incrementing is always well defined, even when overflowing.
> And in the example the result after occuring the overflow is not
> used anyway.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#signed_overflow
