http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521

--- Comment #6 from Tomohiro Kashiwada <kikairoya at gmail dot com> 2011-10-28 
01:32:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Is this related to the strict volatile bitfields change in trunk revision
> 171347?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/expr.c?view=log&pathrev=171347

No, r171347 and r171346 generates same wrong code.

Reply via email to