http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-21 20:16:24 UTC --- Wow, that one is worthy of its own bug report, it's not just an unclear diagnostic, it's completely bogus. x[01] is *(x+1) or *((char*)x + 4) but what G++ prints is just wrong
