http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016
--- Comment #4 from PcX <xunxun1982 at gmail dot com> 2011-08-07 23:22:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I can not reproduce this on my system. I did notice a warning about line > truncation on the long line in the example. You may want to use line > continuations for that one like this: > > > write(13,rec=jj*i+j)nlgs(1,j,i),dlgs(200,j,i),nlgs(2,j,i),dlgs(199,j,i),& > & nlgs(3,j,i),dlgs(198,j,i),nlgs(4,j,i),dlgs(197,j,i),nlgs(5:8,j,i),& > & dlgs(154:190,j,i) > > Sometimes if you get truncated in just the right place, the program will still > compile and run, but not the way you think it is. Yea, I modify it as your follows, but it will also take a very long time (so I break it when it runs more than 1 minute). At the same time, gcc 4.5.3 will only take some seconds. btw, I use Win7 64bit, the CRT is MinGW64 project's CRT. But my gcc4.5.3 also use MinGW64 CRT, so I think that's the gcc4.6's reason, not CRT's.
