http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 19:39:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Adjusting title. The problem really only applies to (type-bound) *operators*, > right? No idea. The example is, but I don't know whether other generics are properly checked for ambiguity or not.
