http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #84 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-21 12:14:17 UTC ---
> --- Comment #83 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com>
> 2011-07-21 12:08:32 UTC ---
> Ok, thus I marked 30112 as blocking this, I'll try to raise its priority.
Fine, thanks.
> Otherwise Rainer, ok, in terms of producing an actual patch I was addressing
> mostly Marc, but, unless I'm badly misremembering, something *should* be
> special about Solaris, eg I'm pretty sure I can fix the macro for systems
> using
> glibc without major problems. Thus it would be great if you could coordinate
IIUC the major problem is that the Solaris headers (at least since
Solaris 10) are (fully?) C++ aware, while glibc is not, so we were
running into conflicts. I brought the issue and my findings with fixing
Solaris headers to avoid the conflicts up with the Solaris C++ and libc
engineers, and there was major opposition to `fixing' them for the
benefit of libstdc++ if the problem is mostly on the libstdc++ side.
> with Marc in terms of extensive testing on Solaris...
Sure, no problem: I've got an extensive test farm over here, from
Solaris 8 to 11, both x86 and SPARC. As soon as something is ready for
testing, I'm prepared :-)
Rainer
