http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #18 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org <mrs at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-20
21:25:37 UTC ---
Iain, I'm thinking we should do your code unconditionally for darwin10 and
later. In darwin10.h, we put:
#define LINKER_PEDANTICALLY_WANTS_CSTRING 1
and then in the code:
if ((LINKER_PEDANTICALLY_WANTS_CSTRING
|| darwin_constant_cfstrings || flag_merge_constants)
&& TREE_CODE (exp) == STRING_CST
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (exp)) == ARRAY_TYPE
&& align <= 256
Another possibility, is to just _always_ do this:
if (TREE_CODE (exp) == STRING_CST
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (exp)) == ARRAY_TYPE
&& align <= 256
thoughts? Jack, if you do the testsuite run, I'll check it in if it works.
I'm a little nervous about the release branch... :-( Linker, shut up, would
have been my preference, but, I don't know if we have that option.
