http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #32 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-06-20 09:22:31 UTC --- On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 > > --- Comment #29 from davidxl <xinliangli at gmail dot com> 2011-06-18 > 09:05:10 UTC --- > Is Easwaran's patch a reasonable way to go? The approach looks reasonable (with create_tmp_var instead of _reg), whether it is ok in the calls.c context I didn't look at. Richard.
