http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-04 
06:17:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The resolution of core 1092 might make this work, though.  It isn't reflected
> in the issues list, but the discussion in Madrid suggested that we should
> always ignore constructors taking non-related types when trying to copy an
> object of the same type.

But doing this breaks auto_ptr.  And v3 future as well, for some reason.

Reply via email to