http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
--- Comment #28 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-02 21:46:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) > I've posted a patch to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00191.html > which gives this for the code in comment 25 BTW, I would suggest that you use warning_at, but I guess this is a lost battle.
