http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190
Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd <froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-27
18:57:23 UTC ---
That's what I get for not actually *looking* at the definition.
The only quick non-reverting way I see of fixing this is to use TREE_TYPE
instead of TREE_CHAIN...which is gross. CC'ing Honza to see if he has good
ideas.
