http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #1 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com <richard.guenther at gmail dot com> 2011-05-27 13:53:57 UTC --- On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, ro at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191 > > Summary: gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on SPARC > Product: gcc > Version: 4.7.0 > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: normal > Priority: P3 > Component: middle-end > AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org > ReportedBy: r...@gcc.gnu.org > CC: ebotca...@gcc.gnu.org, richard.guent...@gmail.com > Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.* > Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.* > Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.* > > > The new gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c test FAILs on Solaris/SPARC: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "memcpy" > FAIL: gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "MEM" 1 > > The dump looks like this: > > ;; Function get_int (get_int) > > get_int (const void * p) > { > int w; > int D.1980; > > <bb 2>: > __builtin_memcpy (&w, p_1(D), 4); > D.1980_2 = w; > return D.1980_2; Is sparc a strict-alignment target? Then that's expected. Hmm. Not sure we have a dg-effective-target strict-align ... so you probably have to add some xfails.
