http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49000
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-05-18 03:29:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Please also check any proposed fix against this second failure, which looks to
> me as if it's caused by the same thing. I've renamed homologous structures to
> emphasize the similarity.
>
> cat >test1875040564.c <<EOF
> extern int g_5b;
> static int *func_60b(int **p) { return *p; }
> void func_97b(int *p_19b) {
> int *l_234b = &g_5b;
> int **l_25b = &l_234b;
>
> p_19b = func_60b(&l_234b);
> escape(0 == &p_19b);
> }
> int func_1b() {
> func_97b(0);
> }
> EOF
> gcc -w -O2 -g -c test1875040564.c
>
> test1875040564.c: In function ‘func_1b’:
> test1875040564.c:12:1: error: expected an SSA_NAME object
> test1875040564.c:12:1: error: in statement
> # DEBUG D#1 => l_234b
> test1875040564.c:12:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
>
>
I think this is a difference bug.
