http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49000
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-05-18 03:29:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Please also check any proposed fix against this second failure, which looks to > me as if it's caused by the same thing. I've renamed homologous structures to > emphasize the similarity. > > cat >test1875040564.c <<EOF > extern int g_5b; > static int *func_60b(int **p) { return *p; } > void func_97b(int *p_19b) { > int *l_234b = &g_5b; > int **l_25b = &l_234b; > > p_19b = func_60b(&l_234b); > escape(0 == &p_19b); > } > int func_1b() { > func_97b(0); > } > EOF > gcc -w -O2 -g -c test1875040564.c > > test1875040564.c: In function ‘func_1b’: > test1875040564.c:12:1: error: expected an SSA_NAME object > test1875040564.c:12:1: error: in statement > # DEBUG D#1 => l_234b > test1875040564.c:12:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed > > I think this is a difference bug.