http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48860
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-05-04 13:25:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Could this be similar to the required change from... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01024.html > > to adapt to the darwin assembler's usage of movq? Yes... Unfortunately, the commit didn't explain, why inconsistent use of movd vs. movq.
