http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] |[4.6 / 4.7 Regression]
|std::complex constructor |std::complex constructor
|buggy in the face of NaN's |buggy in the face of NaN's
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-04-27
09:08:31 UTC ---
Ok, thanks, let's see what I can do over the next days, I'll contact you again
if I will get stuck.
PS: C++1x is private jargon, but well, as -std= argument, together with c++0x
we'll need something more realistic, at some point, don't you think? ;)
