http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48558
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-04-11 19:09:54 UTC --- A simple change from return &elf_howto_table[R_386_IRELATIVE]; to return elf_howto_table[R_386_IRELATIVE]; makes GCC to warn: [hjl@gnu-6 bfd]$ cat x.c enum bfd_reloc_code_real { BFD_RELOC_386_IRELATIVE }; typedef enum bfd_reloc_code_real bfd_reloc_code_real_type; typedef const struct reloc_howto_struct reloc_howto_type; struct reloc_howto_struct { unsigned int type; }; enum elf_i386_reloc_type { R_386_IRELATIVE = 42, }; static reloc_howto_type elf_howto_table[]= { { (unsigned) R_386_IRELATIVE } }; reloc_howto_type elf_i386_reloc_type_lookup (bfd_reloc_code_real_type code) { switch (code) { case BFD_RELOC_386_IRELATIVE: return elf_howto_table[R_386_IRELATIVE]; default: break; } return elf_howto_table[0]; } [hjl@gnu-6 bfd]$ /usr/gcc-4.7.0-x32/bin/gcc -O3 -S -Wall x.c -Warray-bounds x.c: In function ‘elf_i386_reloc_type_lookup’: x.c:25:29: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] [hjl@gnu-6 bfd]$