http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48169
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
Severity|critical |normal
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-17
16:02:00 UTC ---
In a template unqualified names are not looked up in dependent base classes
Even if it was a bug, it would not be 'critical' severity, gcc does not crash,
no data is lost.. That field is not meant for you to say "I think this is
really really important"
